I live in one of the most puritanically backward states in the Union.
I know, this should’ve dawned on me some time ago, but I never said I was quick study. It took hosting our hairdresser and his boyfriend for dinner to make me fully realize how ass-backward PA really is. [ Editor’s note: Yes, the hairdresser is actually gay. Sometimes dogs pee right on the fire hydrant, too, okay? Just because it sounds cliché doesn’t mean that it doesn’t actually happen from time to time. If I could have made him a firefighter instead of a hairdresser I would do it, not that there is anything wrong with being a gay hairdresser, but it would’ve sounded more original. In any case, it wouldn’t have been true, so just get over it! ]
I’m not actually talking about the fact that Pennsylvania is one of a handful of states that operate as an anti-capitalist monopoly regarding the sale and distribution of alcohol. That’s just the tip of the disquieting, anti-intellectual iceberg. Or that PA seems to be in a near-continual battle to have creationism taught in schools, as if it were actually a science, which it’s not (not even close). [ Editor’s note: Don’t get me started on this… but since we did get started, I feel it’s worth noting that there are very few areas of science which have both overwhelming evidence in support of their theories and insanely good track records of measurable predictability. Three of these are quantum physics, the General Relativity theory (including gravitation), and… evolution. Saying one doesn’t “believe” in evolution is more or less akin to saying that one doesn’t “believe” in gravity. Neither gravity nor evolution nor quantum physics – nor all of the evidence in support of all three, of which there is… well, a lot – care that you don’t agree with them, they just *are* and they go right on predicting outcomes to insanely long decimal points of accuracy. ]
The kicker for me is that Pennsylvania has yet to recognize same-sex marriages. The whole thing is getting embarrassing, frankly. It’s like we made it out of 1957, only no one bothered to tell most of my state (or its legislators). At this point the natural reaction is to think, “well, why don’t you just move somewhere else, dumb ass?” Which of course fails to take into account everything else – family, neighborhood, friends, school systems, jobs – particularly the fact that otherwise I love the state enough to want to actually change things for the better here.
Anyway, despite our hairdresser’s boyfriend having worked as a bartender, neither of our guests professes to be well-versed in wine. And so the idea was to expose these guys to vinous stuff that they might not get to try very often, but that was also tasty enough to be enjoyed without too much context or “geeking.” Tasty enough to temporarily salve the pain inflicted by the policies of their home state? Well, let’s just say we all managed to forget about PA’s anachronistic transgressions for at least one evening…
2011 Vallformosa Col Leccio Pinot Noir Brut (Cava, $35)
For the most part, this berry-red Cava – made not from the traditional Cava bubbly grapes but from Pinot Noir – will make you do a triple-head-fake move and keep looking at the bottle to see if it’s really from Cava. I mean, I’m a Cava fan generally for the value, but I admit that a lot of the cheaper stuff tastes like moonshine infused with baby aspirin. Not this puppy; definitely not in the value category, but this is worth the thirty-five bones, as it’s pure cherries-and-rose-petal infusion, and I found myself agreeing with Ed McCarthy (look, I’ve judged with the man – he knows of what he speaketh when it comes to bubbly) on the surprising elegance of this wine.
2011 Salomon Unhof Steiner Kögl Riesling Erste Lage ÖTW (Kremstal, $30)
Good luck pronouncing it (it’s better to just have it in your mouth so you won’t be tempted to try, anyway). Salomon Unhof has been in the biz for over 200 years, the productino beginning in the late 1700s by Capucine Monks. Fortunately for us, not much seems to have been lost in the multiple generational hand-offs since then, if this Riesling is any indication. Pithy, full of stone fruits, lychee, minerals, and an insane amount of ginger and spices.
2010 d’Arenberg McLaren Sand Hills Grenache (McLaren Vale, $85)
Part of a new lineup of single-vineyard releases by d’Arenberg, I found it difficult to understand why half of this bottle was left by the end of the night. Maybe it was the back label, which has several paragraphs devoted to the wine’s background, which I don’t feel it’s necessary to repeat here (especially when you can read it yourself on-line, which I wouldn’t, because then you’ll want to buy it and you’ll be out $85 bucks). Anyway, I, for one, was doing my part to make up for everyone else’s difference in that regard, because I loved it. Spices, leather, flowers, and above all a tart red fruit core that suggested several years aging might still see this wine presnting itself a fresh as a daisy. The kind of red that’s a gourmand and an intellectual.
2010 Barton & Guestier Sauternes (Sauternes, $25)
Not the wine of the night, but a better (and less expensive – that price is for the full bottle) introduction to what Sauternes has to offer you’re unlikely to find. And it’s a bit of a rarity in that it’s really a Sauternes for now, and not one for a-few-decades-from-now. Lots of cooked, honeyed fruits, golden hues, bready funk and a shot of vinyl. Now, after a few days in the bottle this also will introduce you to the other side of Sauternes; namely, enough volatile acidity to think you’re in a nail polish removal chemical production facility. But an opened bottle of this viscous treat is unlikely to last that long, anyway.
Cheers!
A lot to address here in this post, but I will not criticize you for your political/social views on a wine blog (mainly since I agree with all of them), nor will I question a $35 Cava ($35?!?), or even take a cheap jab at the Steelers (since the Eagles are likely far worse and I am only paying attention to College Football these days–Go Buckeyes!).
No, what I want to focus on is the second line of the article where you say: "hosting our hairdresser". "Our" hairdresser? Really? I do not begrudge the Dudette one iota, but you? Well….
Dude, I can't just let anyone touch this coif! :-)
lol I second the drunken cyclist (that sounds dangerous). This is wine bud no tpolitics. But yeah I agree with mostly what you are saying. Going to give 2010 d’Arenberg McLaren Sand Hills Grenache a shot…
JSammy – technically the party about evolution/creationism isn’t politics, but you’re awesome so we’ll let that slide :-).
Actually, After reading your site a bit more, visiting and seeing the responses, I think it's pretty awesome to wrap everything up with a glass of wine. I had an epiphany: IF we weren't online, we'd be at a dining room table or at a restaurant, etc having these same discussions…over a glass of wine…
J Sammy – except here fewer real plates get thrown…
Just what we need, a high school dropout trying to explain science. That's rich. Stick to wine, not whining. Who cares about what you think, or your friends? This is what is so humorous about the left. They actually think people need to know what they think. Halfwit, the vast majority of us have forgotten more than you know. Evolution is science? Obviously, a victim of public education.
Sit down, shut up, and take a load off your ankles, and leave the thinking to those of us who have completed college.
Alan, in answer to your questions: 1) about 20k people per month on average, according to my numbers, 2) actually it’s a scientific theorem, 3) see number two. P.s., I was once a registered Republican, and I have a masters degree from Penn State.
Alan…which college is it that you completed? Just curious if it is one with a strong scientific program. Based on my research, evolution appears to be widely accepted as a science by the scientific community. It is both observable and testable, is supported by hard evidence, and enables one to make valid predictions.
As for "Who cares about what you think"…it seems to me that you care quite a bit. Otherwise, why such a strong reaction?
Cutter – please do not feed the trolls…
I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability. – Ron White
Joe weighs like $1.50. He isn't taking much of a load off of his ankles if he sits down. His back might need a break, though…
Alan, this blog states right up front that it is for the not-so-serious drinker. Maybe you should check out more serious sites, and take your brand of comedy over there?
Whitey – more like $1.25….
I actually do not mind Joe dipping his toe into social/political issues on a wine blog. Too many people are too worried about delving into provocative (I almost said "controversial" but how evolution or climate change are refutable is beyond me) and pissing people off–worried what will happen to their "business" or some such nonsense. The result? A bifurcated society that is afraid to have any discussion of substance.
Oh, and I have a Ph.D. from a private, Ivy League school in case the knuckle dragger up there was wondering.
DC – I thought you'd gotten that via mail order?
Shhhh!
I visit to PA from time to time to visit my husbands family and it's pretty impossible to find good wine. He's near Philly- any suggestions?
Thx!
Erica
It depends on where “near Philly” is. I live in the city and there are a few stores that are better than most. Let me know the town and either Joe or I can give you the details (he lives a bit further out of Philly).
My dad is an Italian barber… that happens, too, cliche as it is.
Wb – so was mine!
Enjoying the commentary here!
Knuckle dragger's are Caymus drinkers!
There are amazing Cava's priced as high as top Champagne
and some are better that the Champagne at the same price!
Thanks, Joe.